Isolation of Thermophilic Bacteria from Extreme Environments in Northern Chile. (2024)

Author(s): Bernardita Valenzuela (corresponding author) [1,2,*]; Francisco Solís-Cornejo [1]; Rubén Araya [3]; Pedro Zamorano (corresponding author) [1,3,4,*]

1. Introduction

The proliferation rate of microorganisms in their habitat is significantly influenced by a myriad of chemical and physical environmental conditions. Among the key factors shaping natural environments, four play a particularly crucial role in determining microbial proliferation: temperature, pH, water availability, and oxygen levels [1,2]. “Moderate” environments are essential for sustaining life, encompassing conditions with pH levels close to neutral, temperatures ranging between 20 and 40 °C, atmospheric pressure at 1, and an adequate supply of water, nutrients, and salts. On the other hand, environments deviating significantly from these ranges, either higher or lower, are defined as “Extreme Environments” [3]. It is important to indicate that the term “extreme” is relative and anthropocentric in nature, not necessarily describing something beyond biological understanding [4,5].

In extreme environments, a diverse array of microorganisms thrives, capable of proliferating under various harsh conditions such as extreme temperatures, salinity, pH, and pressure, earning them the name “extremophiles” [6]. The term “extremophile” was first coined by MacElroy in 1974 to describe microorganisms inhabiting such extreme environments [7]. Researchers have also shown great interest in studying the enzymes of these extremophilic microorganisms, primarily due to their significant economic potential in various industrial processes. These enzymes find applications in agriculture, food production, breweries, detergents, textiles, and even stationery [8]. Moreover, there are biotechnological applications in genetic identification and diagnostics [9]. The advancement of this field has been made possible by the isolation of numerous microorganisms from extreme environments and the subsequent extraction and characterization of their extremozymes [10,11,12,13]. These studies have paved the way for tapping into the potential of extremophiles and their enzymes, opening new possibilities for various industries and biotechnological research. Among all the organisms considered extreme, thermophiles have received the most extensive research attention due to the thermoresistance of their internal components [12,13,14,15,16]. By definition, these microorganisms thrive at temperatures above 45 °C, and those that can proliferate above 80 °C are referred to as hyperthermophiles [17]. Remarkably, some hyperthermophiles can even survive temperatures exceeding 100 °C, exemplified by the Archaea Pyrococcus furiosus [18] and Methanopyrus kandleri [19].

The studies conducted on these microorganisms consistently demonstrate their close association with thermal habitats, such as hot springs, volcanoes, sulfate fields, and hydrothermal vents on the seabed, co-existing with thermophilic microorganisms of both Bacteria and Archaea domains [17].

To thrive in high-temperature environments, thermophilic organisms undergo cellular and molecular adaptations [16,18,19,20]. Consequently, the majority of enzymes produced by thermophilic and hyperthermophilic microorganisms are thermostable, meaning they resist irreversible denaturation and consequently enzyme inactivation at high temperatures. Moreover, these enzymes are thermophilic, exhibiting optimal activity temperatures between 55 and 110 °C [16]. This characteristic makes them of great interest for commercial innovations in biotechnology [21,22]. They find utility in generating intermediate compounds for the food industry, as well as in the detergent industry [23], and they play a crucial role in molecular biology through DNA-modifying molecules [24]. The diverse applications of these thermophilic enzymes underline their significance and potential for various practical uses.

The geographical characteristics found in the northern Chilean desert and high planes show a favorable environment, with the formation of geothermal springs, saline lagoons, and wetlands near the coast. These aquatic systems host microorganisms with unique adaptations to endure extreme environmental conditions. Given these extraordinary conditions, the Atacama Desert has become a significant area to explore for extremophilic microorganisms with potential biotechnological importance, which remains relatively unexplored in the region.

The main objective of this study was to axenically isolate and characterize thermophilic microorganisms from this particular aquatic ecosystem in northern Chile. The goal was to determine the phylogenetic and biochemical characteristics of these microorganisms and evaluate the biotechnological potential.

The study targeted several locations in northern Chile for thermophile isolation: (i) the El Tatio geothermal field, the world’s third-largest and the Southern Hemisphere’s largest geothermal field [25]; (ii) the Jurasi Hot Springs in the Putre, Arica and Parinacota regions; (iii) Laguna Tebenquiche, within the Atacama salt flat of the second region, where halophilic microorganisms have been previously isolated [26]; (iv) Laguna Cejar, also in the Atacama salt flat, fed by volcanic groundwater with a salinity of 292 g/L [27]; and (v) Quebrada Carrizo, located at the southern entrance of Antofa*gasta city, approximately 1.5 km from the coast. The study successfully obtained 15 strains of axenic cultures. Through phylogenetic characterization via 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis, these strains were classified into four genera: Anoybacillus, Aeribacillus, Parageobacillus and Geobacillus. Additionally, various thermozymes, such as amylases, lipases, and proteases, were identified within these isolated strains.

The diverse carbon sources utilized and the enzymatic activities associated with the thermophilic strains isolated in this study suggest a high potential for application in research, and this will contribute to the valorization of the genetic resource diversity in extreme aquatic systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Sludge samples were carefully collected under aseptic conditions from the specified locations shown in Figure 1. Subsequently, the samples were stored at 4 °C in sterile conical tubes to maintain their integrity during transportation, and later processed in the Laboratory of Extremophile Microorganisms at the University of Antofa*gasta. Measurements of pH and temperature in situ were carried out with the use of a Portable pH Meter (pH/Temp) (HI 99141, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA).

2.2. Culture Media and Isolation of Thermophilic Bacteria

To isolate thermophilic aerobic bacteria, we employed Natural Tatio Media (NTM), composed of a water sample from the El Tatio thermal spring (filtered through a 0.2 µm environmental water filter) and supplemented with 0.25% (w/v) of yeast extract and 0.20% (w/v) of peptone (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) [28].

To initiate the cultures, approximately 1 g of sediment from collected samples was inoculated into sterile 15 mL glass tubes containing a maximum of 5 mL of the culture medium. The initial culture temperature was maintained at 60 °C for static cultures for 4 days, using a SHEL LAB incubator (model EI2-2, Sheldon Manufacturing, Inc. 300 N. 26TH Cornelius, OR 97113, USA); while the shaking of cultures at 60 °C for 4 days was performed with a LAB NET shaker incubator (LabNet 311DS, Marshall Scientific, Co., Huntington, WV, USA) operating at 250 rpm. For agar medium, Petri dishes were prepared by seeding the same medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) agar. The inoculated plates were then incubated at 60 °C in a humid chamber for 48 h. Isolated colonies were obtained and further subcultured successively to ensure the axenic isolation of the distinct strains.

Bacteria isolated in this medium were then transferred to various culture media, including TT, YPS, Miller, Kunaemneni, Huang, ATM1, and ATM2 (Table 1). The objective was to establish an optimal culture medium with well-known components that can be replicated under laboratory conditions.

2.3. Determination of Cultivation Parameters

The growth of isolated bacteria was investigated in different temperature and pH ranges. Inoculum size was determined through the cell counting technique, employing the 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) stain [29] in a fresh culture. The inoculation of isolated strains was performed using fresh cultures, and the cell count was conducted based on a minimum of 300 cells observed in at least 20 random fields per sample [30]. The strains were cultured in triplicates of 3 mL of liquid ATM1 medium, exposed to temperatures ranging from 37 to 80 °C (37, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80 °C), and subjected to different pH conditions using various buffers (50 mM Acetic Acid-Acetate for pH 5, 50 mM HEPES for pH 6 and 7, 50 mM Tris-HCl for pH 8, and 50 mM NaHCO[sub.3]-Na[sub.2]CO[sub.3] for pH 9 and 10). This was done to determine the optimal pH and growth temperature for the strains. Each pH point under evaluation consisted of three replicated culture tubes, including three additional replicates for the control without inoculum.

The optimal growth temperature was determined by inoculating 10,000 cells in 5 mL of liquid medium, which were then placed in capped glass tubes and incubated in thermoregulated baths at the indicated temperatures. Measurements were taken in triplicates for each temperature, and bacterial growth was monitored using a light spectrometer (Evolution 60, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 600 nm.

2.4. Determination of Hydrolytic Enzymes Activities

The hydrolytic enzyme activities of the bacterial isolates were determined in ATM1 medium. When activities were assayed in ATM1 agar plates, incubations were carried out in a humid chamber at the optimal temperature for best colony growth. The methodology described in “Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology” [31] was followed for these characterizations, which are detailed below.

2.4.1. Hydrolysis of Sugars

This was evaluated in ATM1 liquid medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) of the specific sugar being analyzed (glucose, sucrose) and phenol red as an indicator. After incubation at the optimal temperature for 24 h, a change in the pH indicator from orange to yellow (pH less than 6) was considered a positive result.

2.4.2. Starch Hydrolysis

To determine this, the selected strains were inoculated on plates containing ATM1 media in agar plates with 2% (w/v) starch, followed by incubation for 4 days. Subsequently, the plates were developed with iodine solution. A translucent halo around the colonies indicated positive amylolytic activity, indicating starch hydrolysis on the plate.

2.4.3. Lipid Hydrolysis

This was determined by inoculating the strains on agar plates with ATM1 media supplemented with 2% w/v unsalted butter. The strains were spread by streaking and grown at the optimal temperature for each strain under study for 4 days. Afterward, the plate was flooded with a 1% w/v solution of copper sulfate. Colonies with a light blue precipitate around them were considered positive for lipolytic activity.

2.4.4. Protein Hydrolysis

To assess protein hydrolysis, the selected strains were inoculated on agar plates with ATM1 media supplemented with 5% v/v skim milk, and incubated at the optimal temperature for 4 days. A translucent halo around the colonies was considered a positive result, indicating proteolytic activity.

2.4.5. Cellulolytic Hydrolysis

This was assessed by inoculating the strains on agar plates with ATM1 media supplemented with 1% w/v carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). The strains were evenly spread by streaking and incubated at the optimal temperature for each strain under study for 4 days. Subsequently, the plate was inundated with a 0.05% w/v solution of Congo Red. A translucent halo around the colonies signified positive cellulase activity, indicating starch hydrolysis on the plate.

2.5. Sporulation Tests

To determine the presence of spores in the isolated strains, saturated grown cultures underwent a heat treatment at 100 °C for 30 min to eliminate vegetative cells [32]. Subsequently, 100 µL of the boiled culture was inoculated in fresh liquid ATM1 medium, and the cultures were incubated at 60 °C for 48 h. Each strain was cultured in triplicate, and a blank control without any inoculum and a growth control (bacteria without temperature treatment) for each evaluated strain were included. The growth of the cultures was assessed by measuring the optical density (O.D) at 600 nm, following the previously described methodology.

2.6. DNA Extraction

For DNA extraction, 3 mL of fresh bacterial culture were centrifuged, and the resulting pellet was processed using the Wizard[sup.®] Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. To assess the integrity of the DNA, horizontal electrophoresis was performed on a 0.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide in 0.5xTAE buffer. The DNA was fractionated at room temperature and visualized on a UV transilluminator (Vilver Lourmat, B.P 66 TORCY -Z.I. SUD 77202, Marne La Vallee, Cedex 1 France).

2.7. Taxonomic Identification of the Isolates

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the extracted DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the Eubacterial primers 27F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3') and 1525R (5'-AAGGAGGTGWTCCAGCC-3') [33], using an MJ Research PT-100 Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The amplicons were cloned in pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and the insert was sequenced (Macrogen—Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Nucleotide sequences were analyzed for similarity to the 16S rRNA gene using the BLAST program [34]. The sequence was also aligned with those of the reference strains using CLUSTAL W [35]. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Jukes–Cantor model [36]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-2281.3475) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with the superior log likelihood value. The tree was drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 44 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 642 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [37].

Table 1: Composition of the culture media used in this study.

2.8. Depositions of Strains

All the strains isolated during this study were deposited in the Microbial Stock at the Extremophile Laboratory, located in the Antofa*gasta Institute at the University of Antofa*gasta, Chile.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

The samples were taken from five different ecosystems distributed in the Northern Macrozone of Chile, as shown in the map (Figure 1). The temperature and pH ranges of the water samples or sludges in the different sampling sites were between 22 and 70 °C and pH 6.5–9.1, respectively (Table 2).

3.2. Cultivation and Isolation of Thermophilic Microorganisms

The Natural Tatio Media (NTM) enabled the isolation of 15 thermophilic bacteria, all presenting colonies with similar characteristics. The evaluation of different culture media, intended for the development of a laboratory cultivation medium, led to the successful cultivation of thermophilic microorganisms. Notably, the ATM1 medium demonstrated vigorous proliferation for the analyzed samples (Table 3). Additionally, certain strains exhibited proliferation in Miller and Huang media, albeit to a lesser extent compared to ATM1 media.

The cultivation results indicate that, overall, the selected strains exhibited proliferation within a temperature range of 40 to 70 °C. This characteristic classifies the isolates as strict thermophiles [44]. The optimal pH range for proliferation is generally found between 6 and 9, with a dominant pH optimum between 6 and 7. Interestingly, the pH values closely resemble those found in the sampling areas (see Table 2). Observations under an optical microscope using Gram staining showed that all isolates corresponded to Gram-positive bacilli (see Table 3). The photographs of the Gram stains of the fifteen bacteria are shown in the supplementary data. The sporulation tests for the 15 isolated strains showed that all the strains were able to sporulate.

3.3. Taxonomic Identification Based on 16S rRNA Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

DNA analyses of the 15 strains isolated in this study have indicated that the strains belong to three genera: Anoxybacillus sp. with 8 isolates, Geobacillus sp. with 2 isolates, Parageobacillus with 1 isolated and Aeribacillus sp. with 4 isolates. Phylogenetic relationships with closely related organisms are shown on the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). All of them exhibit high similarity to previously described species (>98% sequence similarity) isolated from other locations (Table 4). Furthermore, the results for strains M3 and Q1 are noteworthy, showing a high similarity to Aeribacillus strains (100%), described as isolated strains [45,46].

3.4. Determination of Hydrolytic Enzymes Activities in Isolated Bacteria

In order to assess the abilities of the isolated strains to produce enzymes of biotechnological interest, the hydrolysis of proteinaceous, lipidic, cellulolytic, and amylolytic substrates was evaluated in culture. The identification of hydrolases revealed that the most frequent type consisted of proteases, followed by amylases and lipases in a lower percentage. No cellulases were detected using the methodology described in the Material and Methods section. Notably, strain 702B exhibited all three types of hydrolytic activity. The results of the hydrolytic activities can be found in Table 5.

4. Discussion

The northern region of Chile spans a broad altitudinal and latitudinal spectrum, hosting diverse aquatic ecosystems and giving rise to various landscapes and geological features, creating polyextreme habitats for microorganisms [47]. Hot springs provide unique environments for thermophilic microorganisms, characterized by elevated temperatures and often limited nutrient levels [48,49]. However, thermophilic microorganisms are not exclusive to geothermal environments, as they have been discovered in hay [50], deep-subsurface oil reservoirs [51], sugar refinery wastewater [52], hypersaline lakes [53], and cool soil environments [54,55,56]. In this study, we isolated fifteen axenic thermophilic bacteria from two geothermal systems in the high plains of the Andes, two hypersaline lagoons in the heart of the Atacama Desert, and a freshwater effluent near the coastal area in the city of Antofa*gasta. These findings align with previous studies, indicating the presence of thermophilic and extremophilic microorganisms in a wide range of environments.

The isolated microorganisms exhibited a phylogenetic affiliation with the genera Anoxybacillus, Aeribacillus, Parageobacillus, and Geobacillus. These genera belong to the family Bacillaceae, order Bacillales, and phylum Firmicutes; they are recognized for their ability to form endospores and are commonly found in various soil environments [1]. It is important to note that some members of the phylum Firmicutes are industrially valuable for the development of different biotechnological products, like antibiotics, enzymes, and dairy products [57,58]. In this research, the demonstrated ability of these microorganisms to produce hydrolytic enzymes highlights the significance of further characterizing these isolates for their biotechnological use.

The genus Anoxybacillus, initially characterized by Pikuta in 2000 [59], which originally consisted of 2 species, Anoxybacillus pushchinensis and Anoxybacillus flavithermus, has expanded to encompass 24 species and two subspecies as of 2023 [60]. This genus comprises thermophilic and alkaliphilic microorganisms and has been isolated from diverse locations worldwide [61,62]. In this work, we isolated microorganisms of this genus—one isolate in Jurasi hot springs and seven isolates at El Tatio—with high similarity (99.2 to 99.9%) to species of kamchatkensis, tepidamans, kualawohkensis, and flavithermus. Interestingly, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the genus Anoxybacillus show a close phylogenetically group of bacteria that might not allow strains to be identified up to the species level [63,64]. The microorganisms of this genus are predominant in thermophilic environments, containing several species and strains that could be differentiated among them by Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis (ARDRA) and phenotypic characteristics [64]. Similarly, the Anoxybacillus isolates of this study do not differ much in terms of microscopic observations, temperature, and pH conditions, and are similar to previous reports of Anoxybacillus characterizations [62,63,64,65,66,67].

The significant representation of members from the genus Anoxybacillus spp. among the total number isolates holds immense promise for prospective biotechnological inquiries. This genus has been associated with a spectrum of valuable proteins, including amylolytic enzymes [68], xylose isomerases [69], thermostable endonucleases [70], diphenolases [71], and fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolases [72]. This abundance of potential applications underscores the significance of further exploring the biotechnological capacities inherent in Anoxybacillus spp. [73]. In this context, several Anoxybacillus isolates from the mentioned environment exhibit notable hydrolytic activities, particularly amylase in strains 2a55, 702B, SA, M8, and 3A55 (in ETGF), as well as C3 in the Cejar lagoon, and M3 and Q1 in Quebrada Carrizo. Additionally, certain strains, including 702B, 2A55, SA, M8, 3A55 (ETGF), C3 (Cejar lagoon), M3 and Q1 (Quebrada Carrizo), display proteolytic activities. Lipolytic activity was observed in only three strains, namely, 702B, 2A55 (ETGF), and Q1 (Quebrada Carrizo). Notably, isolates 702B and 3A55 exhibited positive results for all three enzymatic activities defined earlier. All strains tested negative for cellulase activity.

Strains CT1, 2B55, and 2*55 were negative for all four hydrolytic activities studied. Furthermore, the phylogenetic proximity of these strains to Anoxybacillus kualawohkensis strain ET103, as determined by the 16S rRNA gene sequence, showed high similarity (99.5%, 98.4%, and 99.4%, respectively). The optimal pH values for culture conditions are very similar, ranging from 6 to 8 with an optimum at 8. The strains present slight differences in the temperature for optimal growth, with CT1 ranging between 40 and 65 °C and optimal at 60 °C, 2*55 being within the same range, but with an optimum at 65 °C, and 2B55 exhibiting growth between 50 to 65 °C and optimal at 60 °C. These differences suggest that despite their close phylogenetic relationship exposed by 16S rRNA analysis, these strains may have acquired adaptations to proliferate at different temperature ranges.

The genus Geobacillus was documented initially by Nazina [74], and initially ten species were identified [75]. This genus is composed of thermoresistant (25–45 °C) and obligate thermophilic microorganisms (50 °C to 75 °C), proliferating in a pH range between 6.0 and 8.5, that are chemo-organotrophic, including aerobic, anaerobic, and facultative anaerobic members, classifications consistent with those observed in the characterization of the strains isolated in this study [76].

Through whole-genome sequencing, researchers have identified two distinct clades within the Geobacillus genera, characterized by variations in guanine + cytosine contents and nucleotide base composition. This observation led to the proposal of a new genus, Parageobacillus, specifically for Geobacillus species within clade II, establishing it as a novel genus. Consequently, Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius is now classified as Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius in this revised taxonomy [77].

The genus Aeribacillus, a reclassification of Geobacillus pallidus, distinguishes itself from Anoxybacillus and Geobacillus through variations in DNA G+C content, as well as fatty acid and polar lipid profiles. Its hallmark features include anaerobic C16:0 major fatty acid(s) and a DNA G+C content of 39–41 mol%, setting it apart from Anoxybacillus and Geobacillus, which exhibit higher DNA G+C contents (42–57 and 48–58, respectively) and function as facultative anaerobes [78]. Various strains of Aeribacillus pallidus have been isolated from diverse environments, such as sewage, oil reservoirs, hot springs, oil-contaminated soil, and deep geothermal reservoirs [78]. In this study, we identified four strains from this genus: CJ1 in Jurasi, TB4 in Tebenquiche Lagoon, and M3 and Q1 in Quebrada Carrizo. The initial three isolates exhibited a significant resemblance to Aeribacillus pallidus P18 (APA022323), with similarity percentages of 99.9%, 99.9%, and 100%, respectively (45). While the fourth isolate shows 100% similarity with Aeribacillus pallidus strain 21KAM21, a bacterium isolated from uncontaminated environmental sites in Milos, Greece [46].

This study emphasizes the biotechnological richness of thermophilic microorganisms in northern Chile, providing opportunities for future research and applications in various fields, from industrial enzyme production.

5. Conclusions

The development of this study has culminated in the establishment of a collection comprising axenic thermophilic strains extracted from aquatic ecosystems in northern Chile. The distinct environmental characteristics of these ecosystems have endowed us with a wealth of genetic resources from extremophilic microorganisms with great biotechnological potential. Representing the phylum Firmicutes, strains within the Anoxybacillus, Aeribacillus, Geobacillus, and Parageobacillus genera, situated within the bacteria domain, provide a robust genetic platform poised for in-depth exploration in the fields of thermally stable enzymes, recombinant production, and industrial applications. Among the fifteen thermophilic microorganisms within this collection, notable hydrolytic enzymatic activities—amylolytic, proteolytic, and lipolytic—have been identified as predominant. These enzymatic traits highlight the diversity within this unique assembly of thermophiles, but also emphasize their potential use as a thermophilic chassis for synthetic biology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.V. and P.Z.; methodology, B.V. and R.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.V. and P.Z.; writing—review and editing, B.V., F.S.-C., R.A. and P.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12030473/s1, Figure S1: Gram staining (1000X) of the isolated strains: CJ1 y CJ5 (Termas Jurasi); CT1,702b, 2A55, 2B55, SA, 2*55, M8 and 3A55 (El Tatio Geothermal Field); TB4 and TB5 (Laguna Tebenquiche); C3 (Laguna Cejar); M3 and Q1 (Quebrada Carrizo).

References

1. M.T. Madigan; J.M. Martinko; T. Brock, 11th ed. edition; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006,

2. N. Merino; H.S. Aronson; D.P. Bojanova; J. Feyhl-Buska; M.L. Wong; S. Zhang; D. Giovannelli Living at the Extremes: Extremophiles and the Limits of Life in a Planetary Context., 2019, 10, 780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00780.

3. T. Satyanarayana; C. Raghukumar; S. Shivaji Extremophilic microbes: Diversity and perspectives., 2005, 89,pp. 78-90.. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24110434 <date-in-citation content-type="access-date" iso-8601-date="2023-02-15">(accessed on 15 February 2023)</date-in-citation>.

4. L.J. Rothschild; R.L. Mancinelli Life in extreme environments., 2001, 409,pp. 1092-1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35059215.

5. R. Cavicchioli; K.S. Siddiqui; D. Andrews; K.R. Sowers Low-temperature extremophiles and their applications., 2002, 13,pp. 253-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00317-8.

6. B. Van den Burg Extremophiles as a source for novel enzymes., 2003, 6,pp. 213-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00060-2. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12831896.

7. R. MacElroy Some comments on the evolution od extremophiles., 1974, 6,pp. 74-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(74)90026-4.

8. L. Kumar; G. Awasthi; B. Singh Extremophiles: A Novel Source of Industrially Important Enzymes., 2011, 10,pp. 121-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2011.121.135.

9. M. Sysoev; S.W. Grötzinger; D. Renn; J. Eppinger; M. Rueping; R. Karan Bioprospecting of Novel Extremozymes from Prokaryotes—The Advent of Culture-Independent Methods., 2021, 12, 630013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.630013.

10. G.N. Gupta; S. Srivastava; S.K. Khare; V. Prakash Extremophiles: An overview of microorganisms from extreme environment., 2014, 7,pp. 371-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2014.00258.7.

11. N.M. Mesbah Industrial Biotechnology Based on Enzymes from Extreme Environments., 2022, 10, 870083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.870083.

12. F. Niehaus; C. Bertoldo; M. Kähler; G. Antranikian Extremophiles as a source of novel enzymes for industrial application., 1999, 51,pp. 711-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051456.

13. G. Antranikian; C.E. Vorgias; C. Bertoldo Extreme environments as a resource for microorganisms and novel biocatalysts., Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005,pp. 219-262.

14. D.C. Demirjian; F. Morís-Varas; C.S. Cassidy Enzymes from extremophiles., 2001, 5,pp. 144-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00183-6.

15. A.V. Mangrola; R.K. Patel; P. Dudhagara; H. Gandhi; A. Ghelani; K.R. Jain; H. Shah; V.A. Mevada Thermophiles: Physiology, Metabolism, Enzymology, and Adaptation Mechanisms., IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022,pp. 65-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9144-4.ch004.

16. C. Vieille; G.J. Zeikus Hyperthermophilic enzymes: Sources, uses, and molecular mechanisms for thermostability., 2001, 65,pp. 1-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.65.1.1-43.2001.

17. K.O. Stetter Hyperthermophilic prokaryotes., 1996, 18,pp. 149-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00233.x.

18. G. Fiala; K.O. Stetter Pyrococcus furiosus sp. nov. represents a novel genus of marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing optimally at 100 °C., 1986, 145,pp. 56-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413027.

19. K. Takai; K. Nakamura; T. Toki; U. Tsunogai; M. Miyazaki; J. Miyazaki; H. Hirayama; S. Nakagawa; T. Nunoura; K. Horikoshi Cell proliferation at 122 C and isotopically heavy CH4 production by a hyperthermophilic methanogen under high-pressure cultivation., 2008, 105,pp. 10949-10954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712334105. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18664583.

20. Z. Li; X. Li; X. Xiao; J. Xu An integrative genomic island affects the adaptations of the piezophilic hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus yayanosii to high temperature and high hydrostatic pressure., 2016, 7, 1927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01927. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965650.

21. C.T. Straub; J.A. Counts; D.M.N. Nguyen; C.H. Wu; B.M. Zeldes; J.R. Crosby; J.M. Conway; J.K. Otten; G.L. Lipscomb; G.J. Schut et al. Biotechnology of extremely thermophilic archaea., 2018, 42,pp. 543-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy012.

22. G.D. Haki; S.K. Raksh*t Developments in industrially important thermostable enzymes: A review., 2003, 89,pp. 17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00033-6. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12676497.

23. S. Arbab; H. Ullah; M.I.U. Khan; M.N.K. Khattak; J. Zhang; K. Li Diversity and distribution of thermophilic microorganisms and their applications in biotechnology., 2022, 62,pp. 95-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100529.

24. R.K. Saiki; D.H. Gelfand; S. Stoffel; S.J. Scharf; R. Higuchi; G.T. Horn; K.B. Mullis; H.A. Erlich Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase., 1988, 239,pp. 487-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2448875.

25. J.A. Glennon; R.M. Pfaff The extraordinary thermal activity of El Tatio Geyser Field, Antofa*gasta Region, Chile., 2003, 8,pp. 31-78.

26. C. Lizama; M. Monteoliva-Sánchez; B. Prado; A. Ramos-Cormenzana; J. Weckesser; V. Campos Taxonomic study of extreme halophilic archaea isolated from the “Salar de Atacama”, Chile., 2001, 24,pp. 464-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/0723-2020-00053.

27. T.B. Castro; G. Gajardo; J.M. Castro; G.M. Castro A biometric and ecologic comparison between Artemia from Mexico and Chile., 2006, 2,p. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-2-13.

28. B. Valenzuela; F. Solís-Cornejo; R. Araya; P. Zamorano Isolation and Characterization of Thermus thermophilus Strain ET-1: An Extremely Thermophilic Bacterium with Extracellular Thermostable Proteolytic Activity Isolated from El Tatio Geothermal Field, Antofa*gasta, Chile., 2023, 24, 14512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914512. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833960.

29. K.G. Porter; Y.S. Feig The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora 1., 1980, 25,pp. 943-948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1980.25.5.0943.

30. S.A. Connon; S.J. Giovannoni High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient media yield diverse new marine isolates., 2002, 68,pp. 3878-3885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.3878-3885.2002. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12147485.

31. P. Gerhardt; R.G.E. Murray; W.A. Wood; N.R. Krieg, American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1994,

32. P. Scheldeman; A. Pil; L. Herman; P. De Vos; M. Heyndrickx Incidence and diversity of potentially highly heat-resistant spores isolated at dairy farms., 2005, 71,pp. 1480-1494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.3.1480-1494.2005. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15746351.

33. D.J. Lane 16S/23S rRNA sequencing., John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991,pp. 115-175.

34. S.F. Altschul; W. Gish; W. Miller; E.W. Myers; D.J. Lipman Basic local alignment search tool., 1990, 215,pp. 403-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.

35. J.D. Thompson; D.G. Higgins; T.J. Gibson CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice., 1994, 22,pp. 4673-4680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7984417.

36. T.H. Jukes; C.R. Cantor Evolution of protein molecules., Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969,pp. 21-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7.

37. K. Tamura; G. Stecher; D. Peterson; A. Filipski; S. Kumar MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0., 2013, 30,pp. 2725-2729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197.

38. M.U. Demirtas; A. Kolhatkar; J.J. Kilbane Effect of aeration and agitation on growth rate of Thermus thermophilus in batch mode., 2003, 95,pp. 113-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(03)80114-7. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16233377.

39. F. Charbonnier; G. Erauso; T. Barbeyron; D. Prieur; P. Forterre Evidence that a plasmid from a hyperthermophilic archaebacterium is relaxed at physiological temperatures., 1992, 174,pp. 6103-6108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.174.19.6103-6108.1992. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1328151.

40. P. Yu; K.Y. San Continuous production of cell-free recombinant proteins using Escherichia coli., 1993, 9,pp. 587-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00024a004. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7764347.

41. A. Kunamneni; K. Permaul; S. Singh Amylase production in solid state fermentation by the thermophilic fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus., 2005, 100,pp. 168-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.100.168. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16198259.

42. H. Guangrong; Y. Tiejing; H. Po; J. Jiaxing Purification and characterization of a protease from Thermophilic bacillus strain HS08., 2006, 5,pp. 2433-2438.

43. J.L. Fernandez-Turiel; M. Garcia-Valles; D. Gimeno-Torrente; J. Saavedra-Alonso; S. Martinez-Manent The hot spring and geyser sinters of El Tatio, Northern Chile., 2005, 180,pp. 125-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.07.005.

44. M.T. Madigan; A. Orent Thermophilic and halophilic extremophiles., 1999, 2,pp. 265-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80046-0. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10383863.

45. K. Kita; A. Ishida; K. Tanaka; S. Ishikawa; K.-I. Yoshida Complete Genome Sequence of Thermophilic Bacterium Aeribacillus pallidus PI8., 2020, 9, e00224-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00224-20.

46. G. Sathiyanarayanan; S. Filippidou; T. Junier; P.M. Rufatt; N. Jeanneret; T. Wunderlin; N. Sieber; C. Dorador; P. Junier Manganese-II oxidation and Copper-II resistance in endospore forming Firmicutes isolated from uncontaminated environmental sites., 2016, 3,pp. 220-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2016.2.220.

47. R. Orellana; C. Macaya; G. Bravo; F. Dorochesi; A. c*msille; R. Valencia; C. Rojas; M. Seeger Living at the frontiers of life: Extremophiles in Chile and their potential for bioremediation., 2018, 9, 2309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02309.

48. T.D. Brock, Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1978,

49. A. Khalil Screening and characterization of thermophilic bacteria (lipase, cellulase and amylase producers) from hot springs in Saudi Arabia., 2011, 9,pp. 672-675.

50. M.H. Sung; H. Kim; J.W. Bae; S.K. Rhee; C.O. Jeon; K. Kim; J.J. Kim; S.P. Hong; S.G. Lee; J.H. Yoon et al. Geobacillus toebii sp. nov., a novel thermophilic bacterium isolated from hay compost., 2002, 52,pp. 2251-2255.

51. L. Feng; W. Wang; J. Cheng; Y. Ren; G. Zhao; C. Gao; Y. Tang; X. Liu; W. Han; X. Peng et al. Genome and proteome of long-chain alkane degrading Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2 isolated from a deep-subsurface oil reservoir., 2007, 104,pp. 5602-5607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609650104.

52. S.K. Tai; H.P.P. Lin; J. Kuo; J.K. Liu Isolation and characterization of a cellulolytic Geobacillus thermoleovorans T4 strain from sugar refinery wastewater., 2004, 8,pp. 345-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-004-0395-2.

53. S.P. Donachie; J.P. Bowman; M. Alam Nesiotobacter exalbescens gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic alphaproteobacterium from an Hawaiian hypersaline lake., 2006, 56,pp. 563-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63440-0. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16514028.

54. R. Marchant; I.M. Banat; T.J. Rahman; M. Berzano The frequency and characteristics of highly thermophilic bacteria in cool soil environments., 2002, 4,pp. 595-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00344.x. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12366754.

55. I.M. Banat; R. Marchant; T.J. Rahman Geobacillus debilis sp. nov., a novel obligately thermophilic bacterium isolated from a cool soil environment, and reassignment of Bacillus pallidus to Geobacillus pallidus comb. nov., 2004, 54,pp. 2197-2201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63231-0. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15545458.

56. S. Das; J.-S. Jean; S. Kar; M.-L. Chou; C.-Y. Chen Screening of plant growth-promoting traits in arsenic-resistant bacteria isolated from agricultural soil and their potential implication for arsenic bioremediation., 2014, 272,pp. 112-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.012. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24685527.

57. C.R. Harwood; J.-M. Mouillon; S. Pohl; J. Arnau Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group., 2018, 42,pp. 721-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy028. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053041.

58. T. Satyanarayana; A. Sharma; D. Mehta; A.K. Puri; V. Kumar; M. Nisha; S. Joshi Biotechnological Applications of Biocatalysts from the Firmicutes Bacillus and Geobacillus Species., Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012,pp. 343-379.

59. E. Pikuta; A. Lysenko; N. Chuvilskaya; U. Mendrock; H. Hippe; N. Suzina; D. Nikitin; G. Osipov; K. Laurinavichius Anoxybacillus pushchinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, alkaliphilic, moderately thermophilic bacterium from manure, and description of Anoxybacillus flavitherms comb. nov., 2000, 50,pp. 2109-2117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-6-2109.

60. D.F. Da Rosa; A.J. Macedo The genus Anoxybacillus: An emerging and versatile source of valuable biotechnological products., 2023, 27,p. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-023-01305-3.

61. T. Nakamichi; T. Nakashima; H. Fujisaki; N. Takamatsu; T. Muramatsu; Y. Takahashi; Y. Ishibashi Characteristics of Anoxybacillus sp. MU3 isolated from a hot spring and its application to the hyper thermal solubilization of sewage sludge., 2010, 27,pp. 993-999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2010.0077.

62. Ö. Acer; F.M. Bekler; H. Pirinççioglu; R.G. Güven; K. Güven Purification and characterization of thermostable and detergent-stable a-amylase from Anoxybacillus sp. AH1., 2016, 54, 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.54.01.16.4122.

63. A.M. Rodas; S. Ferrer; I. Pardo 16S-ARDRA, a Tool for Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Grape Must and Wine., 2003, 26,pp. 412-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/072320203322497446. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14529184.

64. A.C. Cihan Taxonomic classification of Anoxybacillus isolates from geothermal regions in Turkey by 16S rRNA gene sequences and ARDRA, ITS-PCR, Rep-PCR analyses., 2013, 62,pp. 149-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2013-020. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24053018.

65. H. Karaoglu; D. Yanmis; F.A. Sal; A. Celik; S. Canakci; A.O. Belduz Biochemical characterization of a novel glucose isomerase from Anoxybacillus gonensis G2 T that displays a high level of activity and thermal stability., 2013, 97,pp. 215-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.08.019.

66. P.Z. De Almeida; T.B. de Oliveira; R.C. de Lucas; J.C.S. Salgado; M.M. Perez; B. Galan; J.L. Garcia; M.D.L.D. Polizeli Heterologous production and biochemical characterization of a new highly glucose tolerant GH1 ß-glucosidase from Anoxybacillus thermarum., 2020, 99,pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.08.013.

67. J. Wang; F. Chang; X. Tang; W. Li; Q. Yin; Y. Yang; Y. Hu Bacterial laccase of Anoxybacillus ayderensis SK3-4 from hot springs showing potential for industrial dye decolorization., 2020, 70,p. 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01593-6.

68. A. Poli; E. Esposito; L. Lama; P. Orlando; G. Nicolaus; F. De Appolonia; A. Gambacorta; B. Nicolaus Anoxybacillus amylolyticus sp. nov., a thermophilic amylase producing bacterium isolated from Mount Rittmann (Antarctica)., 2006, 29,pp. 300-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2005.10.003. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16682297.

69. A.O. Belduz; S. Dulger; Z. Demirbag Anoxybacillus gonensis sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic, xylose-utilizing, endospore-forming bacterium., 2003, 53,pp. 1315-1320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02473-0. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13130012.

70. P. Sharma; D.R. D’Souza; D. Bhandari; V. Parashar; N. Capalash Demonstration of the Principles of Restriction Endonuclease Cleavage Reactions Using Thermostable Bfl I from Anoxybacillus flavithermus., 2003, 31,pp. 392-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2003.494031060283.

71. M. Yildirim; M. Col; A. Colak; S. Güner; S. Dülger; A.O. Beldüz Diphenolases from Anoxybacillus kestanbolensis strains K1 and K4 T., 2005, 21,pp. 501-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-2392-0.

72. N.S. Ertunga; A. Colak; A.O. Belduz; S. Canakci; H. Karaoglu; C. Sandalli Cloning, expression, purification and characterization of fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate aldolase from Anoxybacillus gonensis G2., 2007, 141,pp. 817-825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvm085. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17400540.

73. M.A. Omeroglu; M.O. Baltaci; A. Adiguzel Anoxybacillus: An overview of a versatile genus with recent biotechnological applications., 2023, 39, 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03583-7.

74. T.N. Nazina; T.P. Tourova; A.B. Poltaraus; E.V. Novikova; A. A Grigoryan; A. Ivanova; A.M. Lysenko; V.V. Petrunyaka; A.G. Osipov; S.S. Belyaev et al. Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: Descriptions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus, Bacillus thermodenitrificans to Geobacillus as the new combinations G. stearothermophilus, G. th., 2001, 51,pp. 433-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-2-433.

75. A. Khaswal; N. Chaturvedi; S.K. Mishra; P.R. Kumar; P.K. Paul Current status and applications of genus Geobacillus in the production of industrially important products—A review., 2022, 67,pp. 389-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-00961-w.

76. A.H. Hussein; B.K. Lisowska; D.J. Leak The genus Geobacillus and their biotechnological potential., 2015, 92,pp. 1-48.

77. H. Aliyu; P. Lebre; J. Blom; D. Cowan; P. De-Maayer Phylogenomic re-assessment of the thermophilic genus Geobacillus., 2016, 39,pp. 527-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2016.09.004.

78. D. Minana-Galbis; D.L. Pinzon; J.G. Loren; A. Manresa; R.M. Oliart-Ros Reclassification of Geobacillus pallidus (Scholz et al. 1988) Banat et al. 2004 as Aeribacillus pallidus gen. nov., comb. nov., 2010, 60,pp. 1600-1604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.003699-0.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1: Sampling sites. (A) Map of Chile. (B) North macrozone of Chile, the main cities (Arica, Iquique and Antofa*gasta) are indicated with black spheres. The sampling points are indicated with open arrows. (C) Termas Jurasi (TJ). (D) El Tatio Geothermal Field (GET). (E) Laguna Tebenquiche. (F) Quebrada Carrizo. (G) Laguna Cejar. [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolates and closely related bacteria. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likehood method and Jukes–Cantor model. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Thermus thermophilus AK1 (AAP024937) was used as an outgroup. [Please download the PDF to view the image]

Table 2: Environmental characteristics of the sampling sites.

Table 3: Cultivation parameters of isolated thermophilic bacteria.

Growth scale: -, not colony growth; +, low optical density of cell; ++, good growth; +++, the best growth. Gram staining is shown in Supplementary Figure S1.

Table 4: Taxonomic identification of the isolates based on 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Table 5: Hydrolase activity produced by thermophilic isolated bacteria.

-, enzymatic activity not detected; +, low enzymatic activity detected; ++, high enzymatic activity detected; +++, the best enzymatic activity detected.

Author Affiliation(s):

[1] Laboratorio de Microorganismos Extremófilos, Instituto Antofa*gasta, Universidad de Antofa*gasta, Antofa*gasta 1240000, Chile; [emailprotected]

[2] Departamento de Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Antofa*gasta, Antofa*gasta 1240000, Chile

[3] Instituto de Ciencias Naturales Alexander von Humboldt, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos. Universidad de Antofa*gasta, Antofa*gasta 1240000, Chile; [emailprotected]

[4] Departamento Biomédico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Antofa*gasta, Antofa*gasta 1240000, Chile

Author Note(s):

[*] Correspondence: [emailprotected] (B.V.); [emailprotected] (P.Z.); Tel.: +56-55-2637620 (B.V.); +56-55-637629 (P.Z.)

DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030473